ArticleBMC public health2025
The role of jealousy and infidelity in intimate partner violence against women: a qualitative meta-synthesis of five studies.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJealousy and infidelity are frequently identified as key drivers of intimate partner violence (IPV) yet remain underexplored in IPV prevention programming and inadequately conceptualised in measurement frameworks. This study presents the first known meta-synthesis to compare findings across contexts, enhance interpretation, and generate transferable mid-range theories that elucidate the role of jealousy and infidelity in IPV.
methodsUsing a meta-ethnographic approach, we synthesised findings from five purposively sampled qualitative studies produced by a joint Collaboration of authors, one in Ecuador (n = 100) and four in African countries: Ethiopia (n = 30), Rwanda (n = 224), Tanzania (n = 48) and Uganda (n = 40). Across all studies, women and men in heterosexual intimate relationships, aged 16-70 years were included.
resultsThe analysis identified 46 second-order and five third-order constructs linking jealousy and infidelity to physical, sexual, economic and psychological IPV, including controlling behaviours. At the community level findings highlighted traditional gender norms and community gossip that could fuel jealousy as mechanisms of controlling women's behaviour. At the relational level male jealousy was instrumentalised as a socially acceptable means of controlling women, such as feigning jealousy to coerce sex. In contrast, women's expressions of jealousy were typically more constrained, and often expressed through subverting traditional roles (e.g. refusing sex), which could result in violent consequences. At the individual level jealousy and infidelity were perceived as resulting from failure to adhere to hegemonic gender roles, further exacerbating IPV risk.
conclusionsTo be effective, IPV prevention programmes must support the dismantling of patriarchal hierarchies while simultaneously addressing backlash to shifts in traditional gender norms. Interventions should also target jealousy and suspicions of infidelity to foster safer and more equitable relationships. Addressing these community, relational and individual dimensions is essential for mitigating the complex dynamics of jealousy, infidelity and IPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.