Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094425›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2025

Underuse, overuse, and guideline-based use of cervical cancer screening: social disparities in temporal screening trajectories in the French CONSTANCES cohort.

Jeanne Sassenou, Virginie Ringa, Marie Zins, Anna Ozguler, Sylvain Paquet, Laurent Rigal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeanne SassenouCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Hôpital Paul Brousse Bat 15/16 Av PV Couturier, 94807, Villejuif, France. Jeanne.sassenou@universite-paris-saclay.fr.
Virginie RingaCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Hôpital Paul Brousse Bat 15/16 Av PV Couturier, 94807, Villejuif, France.
Marie ZinsNational Institute for Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Population-Based Epidemiologic Cohorts Units, UMS 011, Villejuif, France.
Anna OzgulerNational Institute for Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Population-Based Epidemiologic Cohorts Units, UMS 011, Villejuif, France.
Sylvain PaquetCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Hôpital Paul Brousse Bat 15/16 Av PV Couturier, 94807, Villejuif, France.
Laurent RigalCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Hôpital Paul Brousse Bat 15/16 Av PV Couturier, 94807, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Pap test has been an important part of women's medical care for 40 years. Its utilization over time allows us to study both under- and over-screening. Our objective is to study the trends over time in each woman's screening status while simultaneously examining both its underuse and overuse.

methodsOur final sample included 55,141 women. We used sequence analysis methods to characterize trajectories of cervical cancer screening use for each woman. We then obtained 3 clusters of sequences. We performed bivariate analyses by comparing variables of interest according to each woman's cluster membership.

resultsThis study of Pap test reimbursement data shows that 70.7% of our sample was screened more often than necessary according to the guidelines for at least some periods of this study. The cluster analysis highlighted the consistency of the screening status. Once a woman "adopted" a screening rhythm, it appeared to continue over time. Most women who overused cervical cancer screening by Pap tests at the beginning of our observation period overused it throughout the follow-up period; the same consistency was found for those up-to-date at the start, and for those underscreened. The women in the overscreened group were in better health, younger, lived with a partner more often, and had the most favorable social characteristics.

conclusionOur results showed an unequal distribution of social, demographic, and health characteristics across screening patterns. The majority of our sample was screened more often than necessary according to the guidelines then in effect. Once a woman "adopted" a screening rhythm, it appeared to continue over time.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealthcare DisparitiesMass ScreeningMedical OverusePapanicolaou TestUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicSocioeconomic FactorsCancer screeningCervical cancerGynecologySequence analysisSocioeconomic disparities in health

Identifiers

PMID41094425
PMCPMC12522561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.