Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094413›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Advance care planning in German nursing homes from the perspective of the facilitators: A focus group study.

Anna Völkel, Nadja Reeck, Tanja Schleef, Hannes Jacobs, Stephanie Stiel, Falk Hoffmann, Anna Levke Brütt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna VölkelJunior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. anna.voelkel@uni-oldenburg.de.
Nadja ReeckJunior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Tanja SchleefInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Hannes JacobsDivision of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Stephanie StielInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Falk HoffmannDivision of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Anna Levke BrüttJunior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2018, German nursing homes have been able to reimburse advance care planning (ACP) at the expense of statutory health insurance. ACP is a consultation for end-of-life care in which care preferences can be documented. The consultation is conducted by facilitators, who have completed the required training. However, limited research exists on how the ACP consultation processes are realized. Hence, this focus group study, as a part of the "Gut-Leben" research project, investigated its implementation.

methodsTwenty-four ACP facilitators participated in four semi-structured focus groups conducted between July and September 2023. The first three focus groups were held in person with participants from Lower Saxony and Bremen, and the fourth was conducted digitally to include facilitators from other federal states in Germany. The interview guide was developed with the project's practice advisory board in advance. The analysis was performed using deductive-inductive content analysis based on Kuckartz and Rädiker.

resultsThe facilitators' average age was 51.7 years (range 30-70), with 75.0% being female (n = 18). Facilitators typically reached out to residents proactively with the support of the nursing staff, who acted as intermediaries and helped to establish contact between the facilitators and the residents and/or relatives. Residents and relatives rarely approached the facilitators. The ACP consultation process varied in length and frequency, beginning with an initial information meeting and followed by further meetings if needed. Update meetings could be scheduled at any time, particularly in response to changes in residents' preferences or health status, but were implemented frequently. The consultation process and the documents created during the consultation, above all the living wills, were described as very complex, especially for cognitively impaired people, which is why standardized and simplified documents are desirable.

conclusionsThe results indicate that ACP is highly individualized, varying by resident. However, there is a rough standardized procedure for the process, which, like the documents, could be very complex. ACP must be more widely promoted to raise awareness, reduce inhibitions, and simplify the initiation of consultation processes. Besides, ACP must also be integrated into the structure of nursing homes as a fixed procedure.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningNursing HomesAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAdvance care planningAdvance care planning facilitatorsEnd-of-life careFocus groupNursing home

Identifiers

PMID41094413
PMCPMC12529835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.