Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094372›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Differential humidity effects on seed viability and oxidative stress responses in Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd.) during short-term storage.

Muhammad Hamzeh, Syed Riaz Ahmed, Iram Ijaz, Mahak Naveed, Aftab Ahmad, Anisa Umer, Naeem-Ud Din, Jahangir Khan, Muhammad Ejaz, Munir Ahmed Khetran and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Muhammad HamzehPakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Agricultural Research Institute, Jaffarabad, Pakistan.
Syed Riaz AhmedPakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Horticulture Research Institute, Khuzdar, Pakistan. syedriaz7120@parc.gov.pk.
Iram IjazDepartment of Botany, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Mahak NaveedNuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology College, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (NIAB-C, PIEAS), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Aftab AhmadPakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Adoptive Research cum Demonstration Institute,, Wana, Pakistan.
Anisa UmerNuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology College, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (NIAB-C, PIEAS), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Naeem-Ud DinPakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Horticulture Research Institute, Khuzdar, Pakistan.
Jahangir KhanPakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Balochistan Agricultural Research and Development Center, Quetta, Pakistan.
Muhammad EjazPakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Balochistan Agricultural Research and Development Center, Quetta, Pakistan.
Munir Ahmed KhetranPakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Balochistan Agricultural Research and Development Center, Quetta, Pakistan.
Nadeem SadiqPakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Balochistan Agricultural Research and Development Center, Quetta, Pakistan.
Yongming LiuNational Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya, China. liuyongming01@caas.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of relative humidity (RH) and storage duration (SD) on quinoa seed viability, biochemical composition and physiological traits. A factorial experiment in a completely randomized design (CRD) was conducted at 50 °C with two RH levels (30% And 60%) and three storage durations (30, 60, And 90 days). The objective was to evaluate how RH and storage time influence seed viability and identify varietal differences in storage tolerance. Higher RH (60%) accelerated seed viability decline during prolonged storage, as reflected in reduced germination percentage, vigor index, and sharp losses in tetrazolium (TZ) viability, particularly in V5 (91.67% to 9%). Electrical conductivity increased with storage time, indicating membrane damage. Morphological traits (root length, shoot length and biomass) photosynthetic pigments decreased more markedly under 605 RH, with V1 performing poorest and V6 showing relatively better resilience. Antioxidant enzyme (SOD, POD, CAT, APX) were more active under 30% RH, suggesting an adaptive defense response, while proline accumulation was highlighted in V6 (42.73 µmol/g) at 305 RH after 90 days. Overall, prolonged storage under high RH severely compromised quinoa seed quality, whereas 30% RH preserved viability and biochemical integrity. Statistical analyses (ANOVA, PCA and heatmaps) confirmed superior seed performance at 30% RH. These findings provide practical guidance for optimizing quinoa seed storage and highlight V6 as a promising genotype for a long term preservation.

Indexed as

Chenopodium quinoaHumidityOxidative StressSeedsAntioxidantsGerminationAntioxidantsBiochemical markersDays durationPigmentsQuinoaRelative humidity

Identifiers

PMID41094372
PMCPMC12522937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.