ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Co-creation of a motor-cognitive exercise programme-a qualitative study with older people and physiotherapists.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo reduce the risk of falls, tailored interventions including exercise that simultaneously challenges cognition (motor-cognitive) are recommended. However, considerable variation in motor-cognitive approaches exist, and its use in clinical practice is less widespread. This study aimed to explore older peoples' and physiotherapists' perspectives on motor-cognitive exercise and their suggestions for programme development during co-creation.
methodCommunity-dwelling women (n = 8) and men (n = 9), aged (mean ± SD) 74 ± 5.6 years, and 4 physiotherapists working in geriatric rehabilitation were included. Data were collected through nine workshops. The discussions were audio-recorded and analysed employing a qualitative content analysis approach. This study aligns with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.
resultsThe analysis resulted in four themes and nine categories. The themes were: discovering the motor-cognitive concept through engagement in activity, balancing safety and challenge, navigating the complexity of individualisation, and managing motivation and compliance. The context was initially difficult to grasp. Performing practical activities led to understanding, and motor-cognitive exercises were experienced as enjoyable yet challenging to perform. Balancing safety while providing exercises that were challenging enough to make the programme effective was perceived as challenging by both older participants and physiotherapists. Regular individual follow-up during the exercise programme was considered important for promoting progression and compliance. Leader-led, group-based exercises later incorporated into daily life routines were suggested to support motivation and promote safety.
conclusionIncorporating motor-cognitive exercise in fall prevention exercises programmes for older people at risk of falls, may enhance enjoyment and motivation but requires consideration for safe and effective delivery. The co-creative design in this context is rare and the results may be useful for further research and for the development of fall prevention interventions. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.