ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025
Estimating asian elephant abundance: a comparative analysis of dung counts and genetic SECR in a known population of Kodagu, Karnataka, India.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Asian elephant, a keystone species of immense ecological and evolutionary significance, is under intensifying threat from habitat fragmentation and human-elephant conflict. Reliable population estimates are critical for effective conservation planning and understanding demographic processes, yet traditional methods like dung counts can be skewed by detectability issues and environmental variability. Here, we compared conventional line-transect dung counts with a non-invasive genetic spatially explicit capture-recapture (genetic SECR) approach in Kodagu, Karnataka, using high-throughput microsatellite sequencing (SSR-Seq). Our study area harbours a known population of 34 elephants (0.21 elephants/km
resultsDung counts yielded an elephant density of 1.27(±0.32) elephants/km
conclusionsThese results demonstrate that genetic SECR not only reduces estimation bias but also reveals evolutionary relevant insights into genetic diversity and population structure. While genetic methods require greater per-unit investment compared to dung counts, a hybrid strategy may be most practical: periodic genetic SECR surveys to calibrate and validate easier methods (like dung counts or camera traps) used more frequently. As technology advances, costs of fecal DNA analysis are likely to decrease further. This hybrid framework optimizes resource allocation while maintaining scientific rigor, particularly important for large-scale monitoring programs across diverse landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.