ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Efficacy of polatuzumab vedotin versus conventional chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) has a poor prognosis, particularly in patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation or cellular immunotherapy. This study evaluated the effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin combined with rituximab and bendamustine (PBR) therapy in comparison to conventional chemotherapy in patients with R/R DLBCL. Of 86 patients with first relapse or primary refractory DLBCL, 32 received PBR in any subsequent line, while 54 received conventional chemotherapy alone. For comparison, 32 baseline-matched patients were selected from these 54 and defined as the conventional chemotherapy group. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 17.3 months (range, 1.5-85.7 months), with the PBR-treated group showing significantly improved outcomes (median OS 19.7 vs. 15.8 months, P = 0.025). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified PBR as a favorable prognostic factor for OS. In the second-line setting, 41.2% of patients who received PBR were ≥ 80 years, compared with just 11.1% of those who received salvage regimens. Despite this older age distribution, the PBR group showed a trend toward favorable progression-free survival. These results suggest that PBR therapy is more effective and tolerable than conventional chemotherapy in patients with R/R DLBCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41094327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.