Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094324›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for enhanced detection and quantification of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV): A promising tool for disease control.

Mara Olmos, Laureana de Brun, Leticia Maya, Rodney Colina, Aurea Folgueras-Flatschart, Roberto Flatschart, Rodrigo Puentes

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mara Olmos *Departamento de Salud Pública, Unidad de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiología, Facultad de Veterinaria - Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9573-3906
Laureana de Brun *Departamento de Patobiología, Unidad de Microbiología, Facultad de Veterinaria - Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3331-9566
Leticia MayaDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Virología Molecular, Centro Universitario de Salto, CENUR Litoral Norte-Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay.
Rodney ColinaDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Virología Molecular, Centro Universitario de Salto, CENUR Litoral Norte-Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3731-5383
Aurea Folgueras-FlatschartInstituto Nacional de Metrología, Calidad y Tecnología (Inmetro), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Roberto FlatschartInstituto Nacional de Metrología, Calidad y Tecnología (Inmetro), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Rodrigo PuentesDepartamento de Patobiología, Unidad de Microbiología, Facultad de Veterinaria - Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. rodrigo.puentes@fvet.edu.uy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD) significantly impacts cattle production and reproduction, causing substantial economic losses in the livestock industry. The etiological agent is a virus from the Flaviviridae family, genus Pestivirus, which is globally distributed with a prevalence of 60-85% in South American cattle herds. A relevant characteristic of this disesase is to produce immunotolerant animals (persistently infected - PI) that would not detected and eliminate a large amount of viruses in the herd, being the primary source of viral transmission. Early viral detection in the herd would allow a more effective control program. Here, we compared traditional molecular techniques (conventional PCR and Real-time PCR) to one of the latest generation (droplet digital PCR, ddPCR) which has shown significant advantages over the aforementioned ones. Serum samples from 46 animals, previously tested for BVD using conventional PCR and including both positive and negative results, were used for this comparison. Additionally, the NADL BVDV reference strain and a synthetic plasmid were used as positive controls, while non-template controls were used as negative controls. ddPCR showed higher sensitivity and precision for the detection and quantification of BVDV. ddPCR Limit of Detection was 0.24 copies/µL (286.3 × 10^-6 ηg/µL) for NADL BVDV reference strain, outperforming previous methods by an order of magnitude. The results showed that droplet digital PCR is a robust tool, with higher sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility, and it can be helpful when used in BVD control programs using pools of serum or bulk milk tanks.

Indexed as

Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal DiseaseDiarrhea Viruses, Bovine ViralPolymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsCattleSensitivity and SpecificityBovine viral diarrhea virusBVDVDdPCRDroplet digital PCRMolecular diagnosticPestivirus

Identifiers

PMID41094324
PMCPMC12660522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.