ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for enhanced detection and quantification of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV): A promising tool for disease control.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD) significantly impacts cattle production and reproduction, causing substantial economic losses in the livestock industry. The etiological agent is a virus from the Flaviviridae family, genus Pestivirus, which is globally distributed with a prevalence of 60-85% in South American cattle herds. A relevant characteristic of this disesase is to produce immunotolerant animals (persistently infected - PI) that would not detected and eliminate a large amount of viruses in the herd, being the primary source of viral transmission. Early viral detection in the herd would allow a more effective control program. Here, we compared traditional molecular techniques (conventional PCR and Real-time PCR) to one of the latest generation (droplet digital PCR, ddPCR) which has shown significant advantages over the aforementioned ones. Serum samples from 46 animals, previously tested for BVD using conventional PCR and including both positive and negative results, were used for this comparison. Additionally, the NADL BVDV reference strain and a synthetic plasmid were used as positive controls, while non-template controls were used as negative controls. ddPCR showed higher sensitivity and precision for the detection and quantification of BVDV. ddPCR Limit of Detection was 0.24 copies/µL (286.3 × 10^-6 ηg/µL) for NADL BVDV reference strain, outperforming previous methods by an order of magnitude. The results showed that droplet digital PCR is a robust tool, with higher sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility, and it can be helpful when used in BVD control programs using pools of serum or bulk milk tanks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.