Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094275›Full record

ReviewPsychological research2025

Revisiting tool use and distance perception: twenty years later.

Lucas Boussard, Loïc P Heurley, Nicolas Morgado

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucas BoussardLaboratoire sur les Interactions Cognition, Action, Émotion (LICAÉ), Université Paris Nanterre, 200 avenue de La République, Nanterre Cedex, 92001, France. lucas.bssd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9240-8184
Loïc P HeurleyLaboratoire sur les Interactions Cognition, Action, Émotion (LICAÉ), Université Paris Nanterre, 200 avenue de La République, Nanterre Cedex, 92001, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8185-6083
Nicolas MorgadoLaboratoire sur les Interactions Cognition, Action, Émotion (LICAÉ), Université Paris Nanterre, 200 avenue de La République, Nanterre Cedex, 92001, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9345-915X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embodied cognition is a paradigm in psychology which argues that perception is not based exclusively on visual cues but is fundamentally shaped by the dynamic interaction between action capabilities and the environment. This perspective provides a novel understanding of human inter action with the world, emphasizing the central role of sensorimotor experience. Within this theoretical framework, the influence of tool use on visual perception is investigated as a key example of how bodily interaction can reshape spatial experience. For example, people perceive distance as shorter when they use a tool instead of their hand Witt et al. (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,31(5), 880-888, 2005). Using tools extends and transforms an individual's motor capacities, thereby reshaping the relationship to the surrounding space. Although this approach has faced criticisms and challenges that have sometimes weakened its credibility, accumulating evidence supports the view that tool use plays a significant role in shaping distance perception. This research aims to explore how spatial perception emerges from the complex interplay between the body, tools, and the environment, with a focus on identifying the underlying processes and mechanisms involved.

Indexed as

Distance PerceptionPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.