ArticleNature2025
Aboveground biomass in Australian tropical forests now a net carbon source.
Article in Nature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seaweed carbon removal cannot keep up with climate-driven loss.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Article
- A potential overestimation of COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Carbon dioxide removals by tropical moist forests offset most land-use emissions across 18 Afrotropical countries.Communications earth & environment · 2026Article
- Pervasive increase in tree mortality across the Australian continent.Nature plants · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tropical forests act as important global carbon sinks
Indexed as
Identifiers
41094245What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.