ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Validation of the six-minute walking test as a measure of postoperative recovery after pancreatic surgery.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The six-minute walking test (6MWT) is a measure of functional capacity, but there is limited evidence supporting its use as a postoperative recovery outcome. This study aims to contribute evidence for the validity of 6MWT as a measure of recovery after pancreatic surgery. Following the COSMIN checklist, we analyzed data from patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study at San Raffaele Hospital (2020-2022). Construct validity was tested by hypothesizing that the distance walked in 6 min (6MWD) at 30 days after surgery would be greater in patients known to recover better: (1) younger vs. older, (2) with higher physical status vs. lower, (3) undergoing distal vs. proximal pancreatectomy, (4) laparoscopic vs. open resection, (5) with a shorter vs. longer length of stay, and (6) without severe complications vs. with. Additionally, 6MWD with patient-reported outcomes, including Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and PROMIS-29 Physical Health Summary Score (PHS), were assessed. Patients (n=151) who completed the 6MWT preoperatively and at 30 days after surgery were analyzed. Data supported construct validity of the 6MWT, showing significantly higher 6MWD in 5 of 6 (83%) groups known to recover better. Only the hypothesis that 6MWT would be higher in younger patients was not confirmed. The 6MWT also showed a moderate positive correlation with DASI (r = 0.41) and PHS (r = 0.47). This is the first study to contribute evidence for the validity of the 6MWT as a measure of recovery after pancreatic resection. Results support the use of the 6MWT as an outcome measure in studies evaluating interventions aimed at improving recovery after pancreatectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41094241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.