ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Electrophysiological correlates of temporal preparation across different temporal contexts and variable foreperiods.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What is prepared in temporal preparation? A review and a historical appreciation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporal prediction refers to the conscious perception of the passage of time and the ability to predict when a stimulus will occur. It has been found that different types of temporal predictions and varying foreperiods could impact motor performance. However, there is a lack of discussion on the underlying neural mechanism of temporal prediction. Therefore, in the current study, externally and internally driven temporal predictions, combined with variable foreperiods, were examined to explore the neural mechanism of the effects of temporal cues on motor performance. The results showed that reaction times were significantly faster in the temporal cue condition compared to the neutral cue condition with a foreperiod of 500 ms. Additionally, the amplitude of CNV (contingent negative variation) was greater in the temporal cue condition. These results indicate that motor performance could benefit from the external temporal information with a relatively short preparation time. CNV could reflect movement preparation and anticipatory attention to the target stimulus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41094184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.