Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094171›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025

Overcoming the Challenge: A Comprehensive Review of Neoadjuvant Treatment Resistance in Rectal Cancer.

Alexandru Micu, Andrei Diaconescu, Corina-Elena Minciuna, Teodora Manuc, Simona Olimpia Dima, Gabriela Droc, Vlad Herlea, Gabriel Becheanu, Adina Emilia Croitoru, Catalin Vasilescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Targeting metabolic dependencies to reverse chemoradiotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexandru MicuDepartment of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
Andrei DiaconescuDepartment of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania. andrei.diaconescu@umfcd.ro.
Corina-Elena MinciunaDepartment of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania. corina.minciuna@umfcd.ro.
Teodora Manuc"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Simona Olimpia DimaDepartment of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
Gabriela Droc"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Vlad Herlea"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Gabriel Becheanu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Adina Emilia Croitoru"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Catalin VasilescuDepartment of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

Ministry of European Investments and Projects, Romania 324809/2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, particularly among younger men. Approximately one-third of colorectal cancers occur in the rectum. For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy is considered the standard treatment approach. Despite advances in therapeutic approaches, improvements in the 5-year survival rate have been modest. Accurate assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is critical for guiding subsequent treatment strategies, especially when considering eligibility for non-operative management (NOM). Common evaluation methods include digital rectal examination (DRE), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and high-definition flexible endoscopy (HDFE). Tumor regression grading (TRG) systems-both histopathological (pTRG) and MRI-based (mrTRG)-are valuable tools for quantifying treatment response and predicting long-term outcomes. However, resistance to NAT remains a significant clinical challenge and is driven by a complex interplay of molecular mechanisms. Genetic factors, such as RAS mutations, have been linked to resistance to chemoradiotherapy (CRT), while tumors exhibiting microsatellite instability (MSI-high) tend to respond poorly to CRT but may show favorable outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Epigenetic pathways, including dysregulation of Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/AKT signaling, along with alterations in DNA damage repair mechanisms, further influence CRT sensitivity. The tumor microenvironment also plays a pivotal role in modulating therapy response. Elements such as immune cell infiltration, hypoxia, angiogenesis, and the presence of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) contribute to a pro-resistance landscape. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiota composition-particularly an enrichment of Bacteroides species-is associated with diminished response to NAT. Understanding these multifaceted biological interactions is essential for developing personalized and more effective therapeutic strategies, with the goal of enhancing response to NAT and ultimately improving clinical outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsHumansNeoadjuvant therapyOncologyRectal cancerResponse assessmentTreatment resistance

Identifiers

PMID41094171
PMCPMC12528186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.