Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094148›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Artificial intelligence-assisted prostate cancer diagnosis for reduced use of immunohistochemistry.

Anders Blilie, Nita Mulliqi, Xiaoyi Ji, Kelvin Szolnoky, Sol Erika Boman, Matteo Titus, Geraldine Martinez Gonzalez, José Asenjo, Marcello Gambacorta, Paolo Libretti and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Anders Blilie *Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9546-5443
Nita Mulliqi *Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Xiaoyi JiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kelvin SzolnokyDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sol Erika BomanDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5733-3178
Matteo TitusDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7893-7385
Geraldine Martinez GonzalezDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
José AsenjoDepartment of Pathology, Synlab, Madrid, Spain.
Marcello GambacortaDepartment of Pathology, Synlab, Brescia, Italy.
Paolo LibrettiDepartment of Pathology, Synlab, Brescia, Italy.
Einar GudlaugssonDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Svein R KjosavikThe General Practice and Care Coordination Research Group, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7004-5533
Lars EgevadDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emiel A M JanssenDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Martin EklundDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5032-5266
Kimmo KartasaloDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, SciLifeLab, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. kimmo.kartasalo@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9470-4783

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2022-06725, 2018-05973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer diagnosis heavily relies on histopathological evaluation, which is subject to variability. While immunohistochemical staining (IHC) assists in distinguishing benign from malignant tissue, it increases workload, costs, and leads to diagnostic delays. Artificial intelligence (AI) presents a promising solution to reduce reliance on IHC by accurately classifying atypical glands and borderline morphologies in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections.

methodsIn this study, we evaluated an AI model's ability to minimize IHC use without compromising diagnostic accuracy. We retrospectively analyzed prostate core needle biopsies from routine diagnostics at three different pathology sites. These cohorts consisted exclusively of diagnostically challenging cases where pathologists had required IHC to finalize the diagnosis.

resultsWe show that the AI model achieves high performance, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.951 to 0.993 for detecting cancer in routine H&E-stained slides. When applying sensitivity-prioritized diagnostic thresholds, the model reduces the need for IHC staining by 44.4%, 42.0%, and 20.7% across the three cohorts, without a single false negative prediction. Among slides with a benign ground truth label, IHC use is reduced by up to 80.6%.

conclusionsThis AI model shows promise for reducing unnecessary IHC use in difficult prostate biopsy cases while maintaining diagnostic safety. Its integration into clinical workflows could streamline decision-making in prostate pathology and alleviate resource burdens.

Identifiers

PMID41094148
PMCPMC12528698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.