Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094102›Full record

ArticleNature food2025

China's animal-protein-rich diets are increasingly reliant on Brazil's land and water resources.

C Govoni, L Zhuo, D M Marchioni, M C Rulli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C GovoniDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, DICA, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. camilla.govoni@polimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-4193
L ZhuoCollege of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering, Northwest Agriculture & Forestry University, Yangling, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5797-4410
D M MarchioniDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
M C RulliDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, DICA, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9694-4262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

China's shift towards greater consumption of animal proteins drove substantial changes in global agricultural dynamics and particularly affected Brazil, a leading exporter of animal feed proteins. Here we examine the environmental consequences of the Sino-Brazilian soybean trade by focusing on land and water resources and the associated deforestation risk. We estimate that Brazil supplies 10% of total protein and 24-29% of animal proteins in the Chinese diet. China's reliance on Brazilian soybeans to feed its livestock corresponded to 17.8 Mha of virtually imported Brazilian land in 2020. Irrigation is minimal, while rainwater represents an important share of virtual water trade. Although direct deforestation linked to soybean production decreased, indirect deforestation persists and soybean cultivation keeps expanding-often displacing other land uses. These findings underscore the complex interplay between global dietary shifts and environmental burdens. China's increasing demand for animal proteins drives Brazil's agricultural expansion and exacerbates environmental pressures in vulnerable ecosystems.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal Proteins, DietaryDietDietary ProteinsWater ResourcesAgricultureAnimalsBrazilChinaConservation of Natural ResourcesGlycine maxHumansAnimal Proteins, DietaryDietary Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.