Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094098›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Human limb position sense measured by repositioning during changes of gravity in parabolic flight.

Bernhard M Weber, Michael Panzirsch, Harsimran Singh, Uwe Proske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bernhard M WeberGerman Aerospace Center, Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics, 82234, Wessling, Germany. Bernhard.Weber@dlr.de.
Michael PanzirschGerman Aerospace Center, Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics, 82234, Wessling, Germany.
Harsimran SinghGerman Aerospace Center, Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics, 82234, Wessling, Germany.
Uwe ProskeSchool of Biomedical Sciences, PO Box 13F, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, VIC, Australia. uwe.proske@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8776-8431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our sense of limb position is believed to be signalled by muscle spindles. To confirm this, we previously sought evidence for spindles contributing to each of three different methods of measuring position sense. These included two-arm matching, one arm pointing and repositioning. The method of repositioning showed little evidence of spindle involvement. This study aims to seek further supporting information for the absence of a spindle contribution to repositioning. With this method, the passive limb is moved to a chosen joint angle and the blindfolded participant is asked to remember the angle and, subsequently, to reproduce it. It is known that responses of spindles are disturbed by changes in gravity. The present experiments were carried out during rises in gravity (hypergravity) and during falls (microgravity), in parabolic flight, to determine whether this disturbed position sense by repositioning. In order to maximise effects, the remembering stage, was carried out in one gravity state and repositioning in a different state. It was found that repositioning accuracy was unaffected by changes in gravity. These results suggest that the method of repositioning, used for measuring position sense, relies on a central memory of previous positions, rather than on peripheral input from muscle spindles.

Indexed as

ExtremitiesMuscle SpindlesProprioceptionAdultFemaleGravitationHumansHypergravityMaleWeightlessnessYoung AdultHypergravityMicrogravityParabolic flightPosition senseProprioception

Identifiers

PMID41094098
PMCPMC12528443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.