ArticleCommunications medicine2025
An interpretable machine learning algorithm enables dynamic 48-hour mortality prediction during an ICU stay.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Adverse ICU Outcomes from Admission-Time Frailty and Nocturnal Sleep Fragmentation Using Explainable AI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Development and multicenter validation of machine learning models for 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Management and Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity Using AI: A Surgical Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backroundAccurate short-term mortality prediction is essential for optimizing ICU management and improving patient outcomes. Many existing models rely on static data and do not reflect the dynamic progression of critical illness. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning algorithm that enables dynamic 48-hour mortality prediction throughout the ICU stay.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records of 9,786 ICU patients treated between 2018 and 2022 at a German university hospital. A machine learning model was developed to predict 48-hour mortality, updated every 24 hours during the ICU stay. We trained and evaluated a Light Gradient-Boosting Machine using nested cross-validation and assessed performance via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. External validation was performed on the MIMIC-IV database. Feature importance was analyzed using SHAP values.
resultsHere, we show that the Light Gradient-Boosting Machine algorithm (LGBM-48h) achieves AUROCs of 0.909 (95% CI: 0.901-0.917) in the training and 0.886 (95% CI: 0.878-0.895) in the testing dataset. External validation using the MIMIC-IV database yields an AUROC of 0.859 (95% CI: 0.849-0.870). The model enables effective risk stratification across the ICU stay and reflects individual changes in patient status over time. Time-varying SHAP values improve interpretability by highlighting associated features.
conclusionsLGBM-48h provides a dynamic and interpretable framework for short-term ICU mortality prediction. The model may support clinical decision-making and prioritization of care, but requires further validation in real-time and prospective settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.