ArticleScientific reports2025
Gender-specific biomechanical effects of smartphone use with backpack load during standing and walking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensor-Based Assessment of Task-Dependent Visual-Postural-Muscular Responses to Smartphone Holder Use During a Simulated Riding-Posture Task.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Walking Speed Modulates Neck-Shoulder Strain During Smartphone Use with Backpack Load.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Smartphone use and backpack carrying are common among young adults, yet their combined effects on neck and shoulder biomechanics remain unclear. This study systematically examined the three-way interaction between gender, smartphone use, and backpack load under static and dynamic conditions. Thirty university students (15 males, 15 females) completed a repeated-measures protocol involving three backpack loads (0%, 5%, and 10% of body weight [BW]) and two postures (standing, walking), with and without smartphone use. Head-neck posture and muscle activity of the cervical erector spinae (CES) and upper trapezius (UTZ) were measured using motion capture and surface electromyography. Significant smartphone × load interactions were found for posture and muscle activation, especially during walking. Male participants showed greater head angles (19.3° vs. 14.6°) and upper trunk angles (28.8° vs. 26.4°) than female participants, whereas female participants consistently exhibited higher CES activity (7.9 vs. 6.8% of maximum voluntary contraction [MVC], p < 0.001). Gender differences in UTZ activation emerged only during smartphone use, with female participants showing disproportionately higher values when carrying 10% BW (15.6 vs. 13.8% MVC, p < 0.001). Critically, during walking with smartphone use and a 10% BW load, female participants' UTZ activity reached 16.8% MVC-exceeding the established 15% MVC fatigue threshold-while male participants approached this limit (14.5% MVC). UTZ activation increased progressively with backpack load in both genders, particularly during walking. These results provide the first empirical evidence that the simultaneous use of smartphones and backpacks can push neck-shoulder muscle activity to near-fatigue levels, especially in female participants. To reduce musculoskeletal strain, backpack loads should be kept below 10% BW during smartphone use, particularly when walking. These findings support ergonomic guidelines for minimizing technology-related musculoskeletal risks in young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.