ArticleScientific reports2025
Fast detection of synergy and antagonism in antifungal combinations used against Candida albicans clinical isolates.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rise in antifungal resistance has limited treatment options for serious fungal infections, emphasizing the need for effective combination therapies. However, low-cost and rapid systems to evaluate synergy and antagonism in antifungal combinations are lacking. Here, we introduce a novel in vitro testing method for assessing antifungal interactions in C. albicans, enabling the simultaneous testing of three antifungal agents in a single agar plate with overnight results. This method, validated against the checkerboard assay, provides consistent fractional inhibitory concentration (FICi) measurements with reduced variability and workload. We applied this method in a comprehensive screen of 92 clinical C. albicans isolates for three antifungals-amphotericin B, fluconazole, and anidulafungin-yielding assessments of a total of 276 distinct combinations of antifungals and isolates. Results revealed isolate-specific interaction patterns, with amphotericin B and fluconazole showing synergy in 1% of isolates, anidulafungin and fluconazole in 19.5%, and amphotericin B and anidulafungin in 23.9%. These findings underscore the need for isolate-specific testing in clinical settings. This proposed assay aims to present a solution to that as a scalable high throughput approach to this clinical problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.