Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094062›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026

Cognitive arbitration between candidate dimensions of psychopathology.

Celine A Fox, Vanessa Teckentrup, Kelly R Donegan, Tricia Xf Seow, Christopher Sy Benwell, Brenden Tervo-Clemmens, Claire M Gillan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Celine A FoxSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Vanessa TeckentrupSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Kelly R DoneganSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Tricia Xf SeowFunctional Imaging Laboratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5930-8929
Christopher Sy BenwellDivision of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4157-4049
Brenden Tervo-ClemmensDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9557-1126
Claire M GillanSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. gillancl@tcd.ie.

Funding

Irish Research Council (An Chomhairle um Thaighde in Éirinn) GOIPD/2023/1238Irish Research Council (An Chomhairle um Thaighde in Éirinn) GOIPG/2020/662Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) 19/FFP/6418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an alternative to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, transdiagnostic approaches that identify latent dimensions of psychopathology through factor analysis have gained prominence in recent years. A key critique of these approaches, however, is that they are performed at the level of symptoms only. This begs the question: are these dimensions truly more valid predictors of external outcomes than existing alternatives? Are there other ways, that are more data-driven, which can allow us to refine our definitions of clinical phenotypes? We tested this idea empirically, conducting a large-scale meta-scientific comparison of thousands of competing factor solutions that allowed us to determine if the latent structure underlying the covariation of psychiatric symptoms has robust and specific cognitive correlates. In nine independent datasets, comprising N = 7565 individuals including patients about to start mental health treatment, healthy individuals, paid and unpaid participants, a broad set of age ranges and cognitive task variants that measured model-based planning and metacognition, we found that factors with the best fit to cognition were those derived from a first-order factor analysis on the maximal number of theoretically informed self-report symptoms available. These factors ('Compulsivity and Intrusive Thought' and 'Anxious-depression') performed better than thousands of engineered alternatives and performed twice as well as traditional questionnaire total scores. Crucially, this unsupervised approached based on symptom correlation only performed on-par with a partial least squares analysis, a supervised approach to deriving factors based on cognition. These results provide evidence that unsupervised factor analysis of psychiatric symptoms is a viable method for rethinking how we define mental health and illness, affording clear opportunities for enhancing our understanding of specific underlying mechanistic processes.

Indexed as

CognitionMental DisordersAdolescentAdultDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychopathologySelf ReportYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41094062
PMCPMC12916499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.