ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of machinability and microstructure in LPBF and conventionally processed M300 maraging steel.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the actual stacking height of metal powder bed in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The heat treatment and machining can be considered as necessary post process operations to create functional components manufactured by means of laser powder bed fusion. Therefore, complex investigation of influence of microstructure on the machinability of maraging steel (MS) M300 parts produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and rolling was performed. The main evaluation was carried out in regard to hardness, milling forces, surface morphology, surface roughness, chip formation, and subsurface hardness and microstructure. The findings revealed that LPBF MS M300 after direct aging heat treatment, containing martensite with dispersed precipitates and reversed austenite, generated highest milling forces. Surface roughness of this material showed a lower surface roughness in comparison to as-built sample Due to the higher hardness, which caused a lower lateral plastic flow and most severe tool wear. The subsurface hardness under the milled area of direct aged samples increased by 24% (900 HV) in comparison to the bulk value, while in case of conventionally manufactured rolled sample the increase was only by 9%. More pronounced increase in subsurface hardness was measured on samples milled utilizing highest cutting speed (60 m.min
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.