ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting carotid plaques in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease using machine learning and SHAP interpretation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Cigarette Smoking and Carotid Plaque Stiffness Assessed Using Ultrasound Shear-Wave Elastography.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Plaque-level machine-learning prediction of carotid plaque vulnerability on computed tomography angiography.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Association of the combined triglyceride glucose-body mass index and serum IQGAP3 in appraising coronary lesion severity in type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- The application of artificial intelligence in the intersection of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the most common cause of death worldwide. Carotid plaque is an indicator of subclinical CVDs. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a risk factor for atherosclerotic CVDs. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for carotid plaque occurrence in annual health check-up populations, to integrate health check-up indicators with machine learning (ML) algorithms and LASSO-based feature selection and leverage advanced interpretability frameworks to elucidate the contribution of individual risk factors. In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 4,973 MASLD patients, among whom 1,178 were diagnosed with carotid plaques using carotid ultrasound. Collected baseline data included demographic indicators, clinical histories, blood biochemical parameters, and liver function test indicators. A predictive model for carotid plaques was developed and validated using five ML algorithms. Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 Score. For model interpretability, we adopted the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) framework to quantify the contribution of individual features to the prediction outcomes. Among the five ML algorithm models, the support vectors machine model demonstrated superior discriminative capability, higher goodness-of-fit, and greater clinical utility compared to other ML algorithm models. Moreover, age, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, sex, and fasting plasma glucose were the most important risk factors associated with carotid plaques in the MASLD population. This study demonstrated the feasibility of constructing a predictive model for carotid plaques in MASLD populations using health check-up indicators combined with ML algorithms. The application of SHAP methods enhanced model interpretability by quantifying the contribution of individual risk factors to prediction outcomes, enabling clinicians to identify high risk MASLD patients prone to carotid plaque development, so that they can adjust interventions accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.