ArticleScientific reports2025
Settlement prediction of undercrossing semicircular tunnel-pile set up in soft clay soil.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil-structure interactions commonly induce displacements, with settlements in weak soils becoming increasingly significant under growing urbanization, making it important to minimize them to prevent structural defects. This study investigated the influence of tunnel-pile configurations on ground settlement during tunnel construction at Zhongshan Road with an undercrossing, using numerical simulation. Prediction functions describing settlement behavior within the model were developed and proposed. The Mohr-Coulomb (MC) model in MIDAS GTS NX was employed to simulate settlement levels of a semicircular tunnel lining and surrounding soil under various pile setups, in order to identify the most effective configuration for ground improvement. Results showed substantial variations in vertical settlement. The designed 5 × 4 m pile setup produced the highest crown settlement, increasing it by 32-47% longitudinally along the tunnel compared to the case without piles, while reducing lining uplift by only 138-165%. In contrast, the 4 × 4 m pile arrangement performed best overall, reducing uplift by 184-194% and limiting settlement fluctuations to - 12% to - 47%, maintaining values within 5-10 mm along the 80 m tunnel length. The 4 × 4 m pile setup was therefore more reliable and less variable in both settlement and uplift. Uniform pile arrangements provided smoother settlement troughs than non-uniform setups. Furthermore, prediction formulas based on Gaussian functions, using parameters n and k, reliably estimated settlement for greenfield conditions and projected behavior for tunnel undercrossings. The greenfield prediction function was validated against 12 existing projects, with n values within [Formula: see text] prediction and back-calculated settlements closely matching observed settlements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.