ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced backpropagation neural network accuracy through an improved genetic algorithm for tourist flow prediction in an ecological village.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early-stage environmental impact forecasting of chemicals and processes with machine learning and data analytics tools.Clean technologies and environmental policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extant tourism studies on predicting tourist flow often adopt Backpropagation Neural Network (BP-NN) and Genetic Algorithm-Backpropagation Neural Network (GABP-NN). However, those models cannot well address the challenge of nonlinear complexity of tourists' mobility, and fuzzy decision-making due to abrupt urgencies and foul weather. The current study proposes "Adaptive Multi-population Genetic Algorithm Backpropagation (AMGA-BP)", which features a novel double-layer ladder-structured chromosome design for simultaneous optimization of network structure and weights. Experimental results demonstrate the AMGA-BP model achieves superior performance with a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 5.32% and coefficient of determination (r²) of 0.9869, significantly outperforming traditional BP (25.22% MAPE) and GA-BP (13.61% MAPE) models. The model maintains robust accuracy during peak seasons (6.00% MAPE) and adverse weather conditions (5.50% MAPE), while also surpassing LSTM (8.20% MAPE) and Random Forest (9.80% MAPE) approaches. This advancement provides tourism managers with more reliable tools for visitor flow prediction, particularly in ecological sensitive areas like Banliang Ancient Village, contributing to sustainable tourism development and effective resource management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.