Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41093970›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Interval estimation of thermal summation parameters in forensically important insects.

Jędrzej Wydra, Łukasz Smaga, Szymon Matuszewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jędrzej WydraLaboratory of Criminalistics, Adam Mickiewicz University, al. Niepodległości 53, 61-714, Poznań, Poland. jedrzej.wydra@amu.edu.pl.
Łukasz SmagaDepartment of Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis, Adam Mickiewicz University, ul. Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 4, 61-614, Poznań, Poland.
Szymon MatuszewskiLaboratory of Criminalistics, Adam Mickiewicz University, al. Niepodległości 53, 61-714, Poznań, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating time of death based on entomological evidence commonly relies on the "law of total effective temperature", which requires developmental parameters of specific insect taxa. These are often calculated using the method of Ikemoto and Takai. However, this approach has key limitations. Most importantly, the lack of interval estimates may give the false impression of population homogeneity, which contradicts the substantial variation typically observed in insect populations. In this study, we propose an alternative method. It estimates interval values for developmental parameters while simultaneously identifying component populations within a dataset. The method involves fitting a finite mixture of Weibull distributions to development time data using the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. This allows for the inclusion of individual-level variability in the estimation process. We tested the method using previously published developmental data on two beetle species, Creophilus maxillosus and Necrodes littoralis (Staphylinidae). Our approach yielded 95% intervals with coverage close to the nominal level, in contrast to Ikemoto and Takai's method, which captured only 59% and 75% of actual cases, respectively. These findings suggest that our method improves the accuracy of insect-based postmortem interval estimates in forensic entomology and, more broadly, provides a general framework for interval estimation of developmental parameters applicable in thermal ecology and applied entomology.

Indexed as

ColeopteraForensic EntomologyInsectaPostmortem ChangesAlgorithmsAnimalsTemperatureDevelopment constantsEM algorithmForensic entomologyMachine learningPMI estimation

Identifiers

PMID41093970
PMCPMC12528742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.