Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41093958›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Community detection in hypergraphs through hyperedge percolation.

Bianka Kovács, Barnabás Benedek, Gergely Palla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bianka KovácsInstitute of Evolution, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Konkoly-Thege M. út 29-33, Budapest, 1121, Hungary.
Barnabás BenedekDepartment of Biological Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. stny. 1/A, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Gergely PallaDepartment of Biological Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. stny. 1/A, Budapest, 1117, Hungary. gergely.palla@emk.semmelweis.hu.

Funding

Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex networks often exhibit community structure, with communities corresponding to denser subgraphs in which nodes are closely linked. When modelling systems where interactions extend beyond node pairs to arbitrary numbers of nodes, hypergraphs become necessary, creating a need for specialised community detection methods. Here, we adapt the classical k-clique percolation method to hypergraphs, constructing communities from hyperedges containing at least k nodes, defining hyperedge adjacency similarly to clique adjacency. Although the analogy between the proposed hyperedge percolation method and the classical clique percolation algorithm is evident, we show that communities obtained directly from the hyperedges can differ from those identified via clique percolation on the pairwise projection of the hypergraph. We also propose an alternative way for merging hyperedges into communities, where instead of imposing a lower bound on hyperedge cardinality, we restrict the maximum size of the considered hyperedges. This alternative algorithm better suits hypergraphs where larger hyperedges realise weaker linkages between the nodes. After comparing the suggested two approaches on simple synthetic hypergraphs designed to highlight their distinctions, we test them on hypergraphs generated by a newly proposed geometric process on the hyperbolic plane, as well as on some real-world examples.

Indexed as

Clique percolationCommunity detectionHypergraphOverlapping communities

Identifiers

PMID41093958
PMCPMC12528371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.