ArticleScientific reports2025
The chain mediating role of critical thinking and AI self-efficacy in GenAI usage competence and engineering students' creativity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing or Hindering? The Moderating Role of Self-Regulated Learning in the Relationship Between GenAI Usage and Higher-Order Thinking Skills Among Chinese University Students.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Impact of multimodal AI literacy, critical thinking, and resilience on academic performance in early childhood education: a multiple chain mediation analysis of multimodal AI self-efficacy and cognitive engagement.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- From AI adaptation to innovation: how leader AI crafting shapes employee innovative behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Pedagogical GenAI use and self-reported creative cognition in art education: a three-wave time-lagged correlational study among design students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on engineering students' creativity, examining the mediating roles of critical thinking and AI self-efficacy in this relationship. We analyze the data collected using SPSS (v.24) and SmartPLS (v.4) to assess the variables' structural relationships and effect sizes. The results demonstrate that GenAI usage competence significantly enhances engineering students' creativity (t > 1.96, p < 0.05,f
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.