ArticleScientific reports2025
Standardization of postmortem human brainstem along the rostrocaudal axis to accommodate for inter-specimen structural heterogeneity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is increasing recognition of the critical need for postmortem studies of human brainstem tissues for elucidating the pathophysiology of neurological disorders. While the brainstem is critical for a myriad of functions it is relatively small with a complex organization of tracts and nuclei. So, interindividual heterogeneity in brainstem structure that can derive from tissue procurement or be related to anthropometric features like height or weight can greatly impact studies of brainstem structure and function. In the absence of explicit approaches to account for these sources of heterogeneity drawing inferences from interindividual comparisons can be challenging. This study used postmortem brainstem samples from well-characterized older decedents to systematically assess factors contributing to heterogeneity in the length of whole brainstem samples. These findings led to a standardized approach to reproducibly assign rostrocaudal levels, with standardization relying upon readily identifiable internal anatomic landmarks. We validated this approach using postmortem MRI imaging. Standardized brainstem length correlated positively with subject height and brain weight but not age of death. By providing a reference series, this study will facilitate the assignment of reproducible levels to individual histological sections or MRI images when full brainstem specimens are not available, promoting reproducibility within and across different studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.