ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of stillbirth using machine learning methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning to predict adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study developed a machine learning model to predict stillbirth using retrospective data from 32,953 singleton pregnancies at multi-centers in South Korea. Variables were collected at baseline, E1 (before 13 weeks of pregnancy), and T0 (before 28 weeks of pregnancy). Each separate cohort (all stillbirths, early stillbirths, late stillbirths) was randomly divided into training and test sets at a 7:3 ratio. Extreme Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm was used to make original models with a full set of variables and simplified models with certain variables from Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values. The prediction model of whole cohort for all stillbirths achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.720 (baseline) and 0.740 (E1) with an area under precision-recall curve (AUPR) value of 0.016 (baseline) and 0.019 (E1). The prediction models for early and late stillbirths achieved similar results. For the original model for late stillbirth at T0 achieved AUC of 0.781 and AUPR of 0.015. A simplified model for late stillbirth at T0 using top-ranked SHAP variables demonstrated similar performance with AUC of 0.759 and AUPR of 0.133. Our machine learning model for predicting the late stillbirth in East Asian women in singleton pregnancies with variables before 28 gestational weeks might be helpful for evaluating individual risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.