Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41093916›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Incidence and severity of aortic stenosis according to machine learning predicted risk of atrial fibrillation.

Alhena Younis, Harriet Larvin, Khalid Kazi, Rowan Hall, Mohammad Haris, Tobin Joseph, Keerthenan Raveendra, Umbreen Nadeem, Daniel J Blackman, Dominik Schlosshan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alhena Younis *Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Harriet Larvin *Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Khalid KaziLeeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Health Data Research UKFellow, University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9DA, UK.
Rowan HallDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Mohammad HarisLeeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Health Data Research UKFellow, University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9DA, UK.
Tobin JosephLeeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Health Data Research UKFellow, University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9DA, UK.
Keerthenan RaveendraFaulty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Umbreen NadeemDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Daniel J BlackmanDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Dominik SchlosshanDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Jianhua WuWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ramesh NadarajahDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK. r.nadarajah@leeds.ac.uk.
Chris P GaleDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/20/12/34789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and aortic stenosis (AS) are two common progressive conditions affecting older persons that share pathobiological pathways. Early detection of AS is critical for improving outcomes, but no prediction tool exists to inform decision making. In this study we evaluated the association between machine learning predicted risk of incident AF from clinical health records (using the FIND-AF algorithm) and severity and incidence of AS. In a disease registry we found that higher FIND-AF risk was correlated with parameters of increasing AS severity including smaller aortic valve area, and higher maximum velocity and peak pressure gradient but ability to differentiate severe from non-severe AS was moderate (sensitivity 0.545, specificity 0.770). In over 400,000 primary care clinical health records, FIND-AF showed good prediction performance for incident AS (AUC 0.782, 95% CI 07.69-0.795), and the cumulative incidence increased with higher FIND-AF risk strata. The hazard of AS was over 40-fold higher in patients with FIND-AF risk scores of more than 0.05 compared to patients with FIND-AF risk scores of less than 0.005. Predicted risk of AF is associated with severity and incidence of AS, but predictive ability for AS may be improved by developing a machine learning model specifically for this outcome.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisAtrial FibrillationMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexAortic stenosisAtrial fibrillationClinical health recordsMachine learningPredictionScreening

Identifiers

PMID41093916
PMCPMC12528675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.