ArticleScientific reports2025
Incidence and severity of aortic stenosis according to machine learning predicted risk of atrial fibrillation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and precision medicine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and aortic stenosis (AS) are two common progressive conditions affecting older persons that share pathobiological pathways. Early detection of AS is critical for improving outcomes, but no prediction tool exists to inform decision making. In this study we evaluated the association between machine learning predicted risk of incident AF from clinical health records (using the FIND-AF algorithm) and severity and incidence of AS. In a disease registry we found that higher FIND-AF risk was correlated with parameters of increasing AS severity including smaller aortic valve area, and higher maximum velocity and peak pressure gradient but ability to differentiate severe from non-severe AS was moderate (sensitivity 0.545, specificity 0.770). In over 400,000 primary care clinical health records, FIND-AF showed good prediction performance for incident AS (AUC 0.782, 95% CI 07.69-0.795), and the cumulative incidence increased with higher FIND-AF risk strata. The hazard of AS was over 40-fold higher in patients with FIND-AF risk scores of more than 0.05 compared to patients with FIND-AF risk scores of less than 0.005. Predicted risk of AF is associated with severity and incidence of AS, but predictive ability for AS may be improved by developing a machine learning model specifically for this outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.