ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing cognitive control through the interaction between stimulation intensity and duration in single-site and dual-site tDCS.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the present study, we investigated the relationship between tDCS dosage and the effects of single-site and dual-site tDCS. In Experiment 1, two types of stimulation intensities (1 mA or 1.5 mA) were applied while participants performed a Flanker task. In Experiment 2, two different stimulation durations were manipulated while participants conducted the same task. Behavioural performance under different dosages was evaluated in the framework of both traditional reaction time measures and the drift diffusion model (DDM), respectively. Conventional reaction time analyses did not reveal any significant effect of stimulation intensity and stimulation duration on cognitive control task. In contrast, DDM analyses revealed that the detrimental effects of high-intensity tDCS diminished as tDCS continued. Additionally, these results showed that high-intensity tDCS in the single-site condition led to longer non-decision time, indicating an interruption to the perceptual and motor processes, while for dual-site tDCS, both the perceptual process and evidence accumulation process were interrupted with longer non-decision time and slower drift rates. This study underscores the importance of understanding the effects of tDCS from a temporal perspective, providing important implications for optimizing tDCS parameters and understanding the underlying mechanisms of using tDCS to enhance cognitive control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.