ArticleScientific data2025
An EEG-based Imagined Speech Database for comparing Paradigm Designs.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) attempt to establish a connection between the human mind and a computer system. While recent computational advances continue to improve these interfaces, human factors have been overlooked. Factors such as fatigue and attention play a key role in brain signal modulation. This arises the need for paradigms designed and implemented in terms of human factors. Therefore, it is proposed to improve the level of engagement to diminish fatigue and increase attention by a video game-based paradigm for an imagined speech BCI. For this purpose, a sample of 15 volunteers (females = 7) was recruited to study the quality of their imagined speech when it is evoked under an abstract scenario (traditional paradigm) and a video-game paradigm. This dataset helps to study the differences in imagined speech signals when using two different paradigms: (1) one that does not consider human factors, and (2) one that does. Additional applications may include designing imagined speech decoding models for BCI and studying the relationship between users' profile and their imagined speech signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.