Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41093862›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Image segmentation network based on enhanced dual encoder.

Depeng Wang, Yibo Sun, Hong Chen, Xiaolei Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Depeng WangChina Mobile Research Institute, Business Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Yibo SunChina Mobile Research Institute, Business Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Hong ChenChina Mobile Research Institute, Business Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiaolei ZhaoChina Mobile Research Institute, Business Research Institute, Beijing, China. zhaoxiaolei@chinamobile.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the scalability issues of transformers and the limitations of CNN's lack of typical inductive bias, their applications in a wider range of fields are somewhat restricted. Therefore, the hybrid network architecture that combines the advantages of convolution and Transformer is gradually becoming a hot research and application direction. This article proposes an enhanced dual encoder network (EDE-Net) that integrates convolution and pyramid transformers for medical image segmentation. Specifically, we apply convolutional kernels and pyramid transformer structures in parallel in the encoder to extract features, ensuring that the network can capture local details and global semantic information. To efficiently fuse local details information and global features at each downsampling stage, we introduce the phase-based iterative feature fusion module (PIFF). The PIFF module first combines local details and global features and then assigns distinct weight coefficients to each, distinguishing their importance for foreground pixel classification. By effectively balancing the significance of local details and global features, the PIFF module enhances the network's ability to delineate fine lesion edges. Experimental results on the GlaS and MoNuSeg datasets validate the effectiveness of this approach. On these two publicly available datasets, our EDE-Net significantly outperforms previous CNN-based (such as UNet) and transformer-based (such as Swin-UNet) algorithms.

Identifiers

PMID41093862
PMCPMC12528696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.