Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41093856›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Frictional healing and induced earthquakes on conventionally stable faults.

Meng Li, Andre R Niemeijer, Ylona van Dinther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meng LiDepartment of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands. limeng.uni@gmail.com.
Andre R NiemeijerDepartment of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-9308
Ylona van DintherDepartment of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-8287

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) DEEP.NL.2018.037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional studies suggest that faults in the shallow subsurface resist earthquake nucleation, because their frictional strength increases as slip accelerates (i.e., velocity-strengthening friction). Contrary to this widely held notion, such nominally stable faults frequently host earthquakes induced by human activities. Here, we resolve this contradiction using numerical models that simulate both geological and earthquake timescales using rate-and-state friction. Faults could develop significant interface strength, expressed as increase in static frictions by around 0.25, due to "healing" over thousands to millions of years. This strength gain can be released to nucleate earthquakes, also on velocity-strengthening faults. These earthquakes exhibit efficient frictional weakening similar to those natural earthquakes on velocity-weakening faults but follow revised nucleation stages and length scales. Seismic hazard for subsequent earthquakes is reduced and vastly different. Velocity-strengthening faults can no longer host earthquakes, because subsequent slip on human lifetimes is stable. Velocity-weakening fault segments may still nucleate earthquakes, but with sharply reduced stress drops. Neighboring ruptured velocity-strengthening segments impede rupture propagation and hence reduce anticipated future earthquake magnitudes. Both the increased hazard for the first induced earthquake and less hazardous subsequent events need to be properly assessed and communicated to maintain public confidence for using the subsurface for the energy transition.

Identifiers

PMID41093856
PMCPMC12528417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.