Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Mengzhu Shi *Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6682-7869
Di Peng *Shanghai Key Laboratory of Material Frontiers Research in Extreme Environments (MFree), Institute for Shanghai Advanced Research in Physical Sciences (SHARPS), Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4235-6385
Yikang LiHefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Shaohua YangInformation Materials and Intelligent Sensing Laboratory of Anhui Province, Anhui Key Laboratory of Magnetic Functional Materials and Devices, Institutes of Physical Science and Information Technology, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Zhenfang XingCenter for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Shanghai, China.
Yuzhu WangShanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Kaibao FanHefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Houpu LiHefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Rongqi WuHefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Binghui GeInformation Materials and Intelligent Sensing Laboratory of Anhui Province, Anhui Key Laboratory of Magnetic Functional Materials and Devices, Institutes of Physical Science and Information Technology, Anhui University, Hefei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6470-6278
Qiaoshi ZengShanghai Key Laboratory of Material Frontiers Research in Extreme Environments (MFree), Institute for Shanghai Advanced Research in Physical Sciences (SHARPS), Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5960-1378
Jianjun YingHefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-9098
Tao WuHefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China. wutao@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9805-4434
Xianhui ChenHefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China. chenxh@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6947-1407
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Spin density wave rather than tetragonal structure is prerequisite for superconductivity in La · full record | OpenQuestion