ArticleExperimental neurobiology2025
Charting Decodability of Dynamic Facial Expressions in Young and Old Adults: Similarities and Differences.
Article in Experimental neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic facial expressions carry a wide range of signals, encompassing emotional but also more conversational content important for social interaction, for which the dynamic aspect is crucial. Likewise, we know from previous behavioral and neuroimaging studies that processing of emotional stimuli changes across aging - little, however, is known about how age may impact brain activity for dynamic facial expressions. To address this open issue, here we used two cohorts of older and younger adults (total N=77) within a whole-brain MVPA decoding paradigm in fMRI. We used a range of dynamic and conversational expressions as stimuli shown with a foil task in the scanner and had participants rate these post-scanning in terms of their affective content along 12 dimensions (including valence and arousal). The behavioral ratings were used to cluster the facial expressions and the resulting similarity matrix was used in a searchlight decoding paradigm to identify common areas. Using robust bootstrap analyses, we identified the insula as a common brain region able to decode the wide range of emotional and conversational dynamic facial expressions for both participants groups. We also discuss additional brain areas specific to the younger group. Our study adds to the growing literature on neural processing of dynamic expressions in the context of aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.