Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41093821›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurobiology2025

Charting Decodability of Dynamic Facial Expressions in Young and Old Adults: Similarities and Differences.

Dilara Derya, Christian Wallraven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dilara DeryaDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Christian WallravenDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic facial expressions carry a wide range of signals, encompassing emotional but also more conversational content important for social interaction, for which the dynamic aspect is crucial. Likewise, we know from previous behavioral and neuroimaging studies that processing of emotional stimuli changes across aging - little, however, is known about how age may impact brain activity for dynamic facial expressions. To address this open issue, here we used two cohorts of older and younger adults (total N=77) within a whole-brain MVPA decoding paradigm in fMRI. We used a range of dynamic and conversational expressions as stimuli shown with a foil task in the scanner and had participants rate these post-scanning in terms of their affective content along 12 dimensions (including valence and arousal). The behavioral ratings were used to cluster the facial expressions and the resulting similarity matrix was used in a searchlight decoding paradigm to identify common areas. Using robust bootstrap analyses, we identified the insula as a common brain region able to decode the wide range of emotional and conversational dynamic facial expressions for both participants groups. We also discuss additional brain areas specific to the younger group. Our study adds to the growing literature on neural processing of dynamic expressions in the context of aging.

Indexed as

AgingFacial expressionsfMRIMVPAVisual and emotional processing

Identifiers

PMID41093821
PMCPMC12580397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.