Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41093794›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2025

[Comparative study on accuracy of three imaging methods in diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome].

Linfeng Zi, Hongfu Jin, Jianwei Zhu, Guoxu Zhang, Yao Tong, Sijie Chen, Wenze Shao, Xin Tang

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linfeng ZiSports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Hongfu JinSports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Jianwei ZhuSports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Guoxu ZhangSports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Yao TongSports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Sijie ChenSports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Wenze ShaoSports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Xin TangSports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of supraspinatus muscle outlet X-ray film, oblique sagittal multislice helical CT (MSCT), and oblique sagittal MRI in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the imaging data of 106 patients diagnosed with SIS between January 2023 and December 2024. The cohort consisted of 32 males and 74 females, with ages ranging from 43 to 70 years (mean, 60.19 years). All patients underwent supraspinatus muscle outlet X-ray film, MSCT, and MRI scans, with MSCT further subjected to three-dimensional reconstruction. Two experienced radiologists independently evaluated the acromion morphology in each imaging modality using the Bigliani classification system. Inter-observer reliability was assessed via Kappa statistics. The CT three-dimensional reconstructions were used as the "gold standard". The overall consistency, Kappa values, sensitivity, and specificity of the three imaging modalities were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was computed. Results: The inter-observer reliability for supraspinatus muscle outlet X-ray film, oblique sagittal MSCT, and oblique sagittal MRI was moderate, with Kappa values of 0.62, 0.63, and 0.55, respectively. When compared to the CT three-dimensional reconstructions as the "gold standard", the overall consistency was 88.7% (94/106), 62.3% (66/106), and 58.5% (62/106), respectively. The supraspinatus muscle outlet X-ray film showed excellent consistency (Kappa=0.77), whereas the consistency of MSCT and MRI was lower (Kappa=0.34 and 0.29, respectively). In terms of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, the supraspinatus muscle outlet X-ray film outperformed oblique sagittal MSCT and oblique sagittal MRI in distinguishing various acromion types. ROC analysis demonstrated that the AUC for the supraspinatus muscle outlet X-ray film was consistently higher than for oblique sagittal MSCT and oblique sagittal MRI, with the highest diagnostic performance observed for type Ⅲ hooked acromion (AUC=0.939). Conclusion: Supraspinatus muscle outlet X-ray film provides the highest diagnostic accuracy for acromion classification in SIS patients, particularly in identifying type Ⅲ hooked acromion, which is strongly associated with SIS. Given its superior sensitivity and consistency, it should be considered the primary screening tool. MSCT and MRI serve as valuable supplementary modalities for complex cases and preoperative evaluation.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultidetector Computed TomographyShoulder Impingement SyndromeTomography, Spiral ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificityacromial morphologyCT three-dimensional reconstructionMRImultislice helical CTSubacromial impingement syndromesupraspinatus muscle outlet X-ray film

Identifiers

PMID41093794
PMCPMC12528319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.