ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2025
[Comparative study on effectiveness of the fourth-generation minimally invasive technique and Chevron osteotomy in treatment of hallux valgus].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of the fourth-generation minimally invasive technique-minimally invasive extra-articular metaphyseal distal transverse osteotomy (META) and Chevron osteotomy in treatment of hallux valgus. Methods: A total of 80 patients with hallux valgus, who underwent single-foot surgery between July 2023 and January 2025 and met the inclusion criteria, were included in the study. Among them, 40 patients were treated with META and 40 with Chevron osteotomy. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups ( Results: All patients in both groups were followed up 6-18 months, and there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( Conclusion: Both META and Chevron osteotomy can correct hallux valgus deformity, improve foot function, and relieve pain, but META has more advantages in correcting metatarsal rotation and reducing dislocated sesamoids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.