Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41093758›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Intrinsic Dendritic Integration Features of Prefrontal Layer 5 Pyramidal Cell Subclasses.

Selin Schamiloglu, Rebecca L Clarkson, Natalia S Stone, Alayna T Liptak, Kevin J Bender

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Selin SchamilogluNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158.ORCID 0000-0002-6257-8313
Rebecca L ClarksonNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158.
Natalia S StoneCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158.ORCID 0009-0006-4386-4169
Alayna T LiptakCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158.
Kevin J BenderCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158 kevin.bender@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7084-1532

Funding

Cellular mechanisms for dopaminergic control of learning in prefrontal cortexR01DA035913 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BENDER, KEVIN J · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
THE MOTHER-INFANT RELATIONSHIP AS A CO-REGULATORY SYSTEMF31MH012597 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DENVER · PI MORENO, AMANDA J · 2000 to 2001
$50k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035913NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH012597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is an associative center that integrates various inputs to support cognition. Layer 5 pyramidal cells are themselves associative centers, as their dendrites span all cortical layers and sample multiple input streams. Backpropagating action potentials (bAPs) are an important mechanism for integrating synaptic inputs arriving at distinct dendritic locations. bAPs originating in the axon initial segment can depolarize the apical dendrite, activate voltage-gated currents that underlie dendritic processing and synaptic plasticity, and influence the integration of synaptic inputs arriving onto apical dendrites. How effectively bAPs depolarize apical dendrites depends on the cell type, dendritic morphology, and the dendrite's passive and active properties. Here, we found that in a unique subclass of PFC Layer 5 pyramidal cell defined by D3 dopamine receptor (D3R) expression, dendritic calcium responses to bAP stimuli were far greater for a burst of APs than expected from a linear sum of single AP-evoked events in mice of either sex. D3R-expressing neurons electrophysiologically resemble intratelencephalic, D1R-expressing pyramidal neurons but morphologically resemble pyramidal tract, D2R-expressing pyramidal neurons. In both D1R- and D2R-expressing cells, burst-evoked dendritic calcium events largely reflected a linear sum of individual AP responses. In D1R neurons, this was partially due to large-/big-conductance calcium-activated potassium (BK) channels, while in D2R neurons, both BK and hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels contributed. These data demonstrate that the intrinsic dendritic excitability of PFC Layer 5 pyramidal cells widely differs and suggest that nonlinear dendritic excitability in D3R-expressing neurons uniquely positions these cells within PFC circuits.

Indexed as

DendritesPrefrontal CortexPyramidal CellsAction PotentialsAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicReceptors, Dopamine D3Receptors, Dopamine D3backpropagationcalcium channeldendriteintegration

Identifiers

PMID41093758
PMCPMC12660168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.