ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2026
Assessment of Spatially-Varying Arterial Wall Stiffness and Pressure Using a Physics-Informed Neural Network and Pulse Wave Imaging: An in Silico and Experimental Phantom Study of Stenotic Vessels.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveArterial stiffness is a key predictor of cardiovascular mortality. This study utilizes a physics-informed neural network (PINN) model to estimate spatially varying arterial stiffness by leveraging ultrasound-based Pulse Wave Imaging (PWI) and Vector Flow Imaging (VFI).
methodsThe PWI and VFI frameworks provide high-frame-rate wall displacement and blood flow velocity data, which are incorporated into a PINN constrained by linearized 1D differential equations modeling pulse wave propagation in heterogeneous vessels. The model was validated using in-silico simulations and physical plaque phantoms.
resultsThe proposed PINN model effectively captured variations in localized compliance, which is indicative of arterial wall stiffness, in both in-silico and phantom experiments, and remained robust under varying inlet and outlet boundary conditions. Notably, incorporating flow velocity data enhanced reconstruction accuracy by 13.84% over displacement-only methods. The approach yielded low bias in homogeneous cases (1.41%), with higher biases for stiffer (3.95%) and softer (8.10%) plaque scenarios, mainly due to limitations in the 1D modeling and lack of explicit boundary condition integration.
conclusionThe findings presented herein indicate the PINN framework has strong potential for non-invasive assessment of focal arterial stiffness, such as in atherosclerotic plaques. Future work aims to include nonlinear vascular dynamics and extend the model to 2D or 3D to better capture complex blood flow behavior seen in stenotic arteries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.