Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41093687›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of anaesthesia2025

Impact of propofol or sevoflurane on the renoprotective effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning in cardiac surgery: the HypnoRenalRIP randomised clinical trial.

Alexander Zarbock, Ludwig Maximilian Schöne, John A Kellum, Joachim Gerss, Raphael Weiss, Hendrik Booke, Melanie Meersch

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander ZarbockDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: zarbock@uni-muenster.de.
Ludwig Maximilian SchöneDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
John A KellumCenter for Critical Care Nephrology, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joachim GerssInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Raphael WeissDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Hendrik BookeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Melanie MeerschDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) might reduce acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Protective effects appear to be restricted to patients with early and transient increases in two cell cycle arrest markers, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7), in urine. Studies suggest that propofol can attenuate the preconditioning effect on the myocardium. This study investigated whether propofol diminishes the renoprotective effect associated with the early transient increases in TIMP-2 and IGFBP7.

methodsThis was a single-centre, prospective randomised double-blind 2×2 factorial clinical trial of high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were randomised to receive either propofol+sham-RIPC, propofol+RIPC, sevoflurane+sham-RIPC, or sevoflurane+RIPC. The primary outcome measure was the change in the product of urinary concentrations of TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 ([TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7]) from before to after the intervention.

resultsWe enrolled 160 participants in the trial (propofol+sham-RIPC: n=20, propofol+RIPC: n=60, sevoflurane+sham-RIPC: n=20, sevoflurane+RIPC: n=60). The median change in [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] as an indicator of response to RIPC was greater in participants receiving sevoflurane (0.070; interquartile range, -0.120 to 0.418) compared with those receiving propofol (-0.015; interquartile range, -0.138 to 0.068; P=0.022). Conversely, elevated [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] as a sign of renal stress in response to surgery was detected in all groups except for sevoflurane+RIPC (P=0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in patient-centred outcomes between groups.

conclusionsTransient increases in [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] induced by RIPC, which were associated with renoprotective effects, were only seen with sevoflurane anaesthesia, but not when propofol was used. The association of biomarker concentrations and choice of anaesthetic agent suggests that propofol can attenuate the renoprotective effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning. CLINICAL

trial registrationDRKS00014989.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousCardiac Surgical ProceduresIschemic PreconditioningPropofolSevofluraneAgedBiomarkersDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding ProteinsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousBiomarkersinsulin-like growth factor binding protein-related protein 1Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding ProteinsPropofolSevofluraneTIMP2 protein, humanTissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2acute kidney injurybiomarkercardiac surgeryinsulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7propofolremote ischaemic preconditioningtissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2

Identifiers

PMID41093687
PMCPMC12799410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.