Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41093629›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025

Bridging generative AI and healthcare practice: insights from the GenAI Health Hackathon at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona.

Santiago Frid, Octavi Bassegoda, Maria Araceli Camacho Mahamud, Gemma Sanjuan, Miguel Ángel Armengol de la Hoz, Leo Celi, Isaac Cano Franco, Gerard Anmella, Tomas Cuñat López, Ana Lucía Arellano and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Santiago FridClinical Informatics Service, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain frid@clinic.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-5770
Octavi BassegodaLiver Intensive Care, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-6026
Maria Araceli Camacho MahamudDepartment of Strategy and Planning, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1205-3288
Gemma SanjuanIT Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1946-4345
Miguel Ángel Armengol de la HozBig Data Department, PMC-FPS, Regional Government of Andalusia Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7012-2973
Leo CeliDivision of Health Sciences and Tech, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-6626
Isaac Cano FrancoFundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2938-7459
Gerard AnmellaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6798-4054
Tomas Cuñat LópezAnesthesiology Service, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6475-9230
Ana Lucía ArellanoFundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-3504
Lina María Leguízamo-MartínezFundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-7947
Laura MezquitaMedical Oncology Service, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0936-7338
Petter Axcell Peñafiel MacíasClinical Informatics Service, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9917-9726
Antonio Gallardo-PizarroInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1517-4073
Ruben González ColomFundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-9621
Arturo Renú JornetStroke Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9169-6856
Guillem Bracons CucóClinical Informatics Service, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-7403
Xavier Borrat FrigolaClinical Informatics, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9348-9284

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the implementation of a multidisciplinary, ethically grounded hackathon as a model to develop and evaluate generative AI (GenAI) solutions for real-world clinical challenges within a hospital setting.

methodsThe GenAI Health Hackathon (GAHH) organised at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona included 13 challenges were selected via an internal call based on clinical impact, feasibility and data availability. Participants accessed anonymised real-world data through a secure cloud environment. Teams employed large language models and retrieval-augmented generation to build prototypes addressing tasks such as clinical text structuring, decision support and workflow automation. Human-in-the-loop validation, explainability and regulatory safeguards were emphasised.

resultsThe hackathon yielded multiple AI prototypes tested on real data. Results varied: entity recognition reached 90.5% accuracy, summarisation >90% clinician concordance and nutritional models achieved F1 scores of 0.75-0.93. Lower scores (F1<0.52, Jaccard Index <0.4) were seen in complex reasoning or multilingual tasks. Bias was explored in 10 projects, with mitigations such as stratified sampling, prompt tuning, disclaimers and expert oversight. A transferable framework was proposed to replicate responsible GenAI hackathons in clinical contexts. DISCUSSION: Interdisciplinary collaboration and real-world testing proved essential for aligning GenAI with clinical needs. The hackathon revealed challenges in bias, evaluation and integration but offered a transferable framework for responsible innovation under General Data Protection Regulation and the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act.

conclusionsThe GAHH demonstrated that GenAI can be safely and effectively applied in healthcare with rigorous governance and interdisciplinary collaboration, offering a scalable model for responsible AI innovation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareHumansSpainArtificial intelligenceLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID41093629
PMCPMC12530383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.