ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
The real-world impact of artificial intelligence ethics frameworks across a decade in healthcare: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the trust-adoption gap for AI scribes in rural communities: A machine learning approach using the 2024 Canadian digital health survey.International journal of medical informatics · 2026Article
- Evolution of Artificial Intelligence Adoption inOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- A framework for assessing algorithmic discrimination risks in training data: a case of pediatric type 1 diabetes.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Ethical Governance of Large Language Models in Health Care: Trust, Responsibility, and Equity in Routine Use.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Healthcare Practice and Research: A Cross-Sectional Study of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Balochistan, Pakistan.Health science reports · 2026Article
- AI Privacy and Security in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2026Article
- Streamlining IRB review of AI human subjects research (AIHSR): the three-stage framework.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe number of ethical frameworks designed to guide artificial intelligence (AI) use has grown substantially over the past decade, yet their real-world effect remains unclear. We aimed to synthesize existing evidence to analyze the practical impact of AI ethics frameworks (AIEFs) operationalized in healthcare. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a scoping review across 4 academic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science), Google, and Google Scholar from January 2014 to January 2025. Eligible studies reported primary research on the qualitative or quantitative impacts of AIEFs implemented in healthcare. Data synthesis was conducted via narrative review.
resultsOf 1807 records identified, 16 studies met inclusion criteria. These comprised 5 preliminary initiatives testing guidelines in practice, 5 case studies, 5 implementation studies, and a comparative case study. AIEFs were implemented: (1) to develop new AI governance structures and guidelines, (2) as ethical review assessment systems for adopting clinical AI technologies, and (3) as ethical "audit" tools for identifying ethical risks. Impact was reported through qualitative improvements to process measures such as improved trust in AI. No studies demonstrated a direct link between AIEFs and health-related outcome measures such as patient safety. DISCUSSION: AIEFs led to changes in organizational or clinical processes, including increased compliance with ethical standards. When embedded in governance, AIEFs improved oversight and evaluation, but audits were constrained by their reliance on organizational cooperation.
conclusionDespite the proliferation of AIEFs over the past decade, their implementation in healthcare remains limited and impact on health outcomes unmeasured or underreported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.