Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41092642›Full record

ArticlePhysica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)2025

Characterizing the motion management system accuracy on a 1.5T MR-Linac.

William Donahue, Shu Xing, Lauren Smith, Paola Godoy Scripes, Eric Aliotta, Jim Mechalakos, Lakshmi Santanam, Neelam Tyagi, Seng Boh Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

William DonahueMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: donahuew@mskcc.org.
Shu XingMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lauren SmithMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Paola Godoy ScripesMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eric AliottaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jim MechalakosMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lakshmi SantanamMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Neelam TyagiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Seng Boh LimMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMotion management techniques have enabled drastic reductions in treatment volume allowing for dose escalation. The superior contrast of MRI combined with the ability to perform cine imaging during treatment enable surrogate-less tracking for gating. The purpose of this work is to commission motion management system with gating capabilities on the 1.5T MR-Linac and to characterize system performance.

methodsLinear accelerator stability during gating was measured for a wide range of duty cycles (16 % - 100 %). Motion tracking accuracy and gating latency were characterized for varying target sizes and breathing rates, and with and without adaptive motion prediction using a commercially available motion phantom. Clinical treatment plans were created for lung, prostate, pancreas, and liver sites, using varied gating strategies and tumor motion amplitudes. Film measurements were performed for each plan and compared to either the treatment planning system (TPS) or a reference film delivery. Finally, end-to-end testing was performed with the motion phantom and film to quantify the delivery accuracy of the system for exception and free-breathing gating strategies.

resultsBeam characteristics were stable for all duty cycles analyzed, with all measurements within 0.6 % of the ungated baseline. Tracking accuracy showed a strong dependence on breathing rate. The system had difficulties tracking a 1 cm target due to through plane motion caused by the helical path of the phantom. Film comparisons for the clinical plans demonstrated average dose differences within 1.8 % and gamma passing rates (3 %/2 mm) >75 % within the 50 % isodose line. The cases with the worst gamma passing rates corresponded to exhale gating strategy where a systematic shift in dose was observed due to tumor motion interplay with the gating envelope. End-to-end testing showed excellent dose agreement (<3 % average dose difference) and a localization accuracy of <1 mm for targets with non-periodic motion and <2 mm for moving targets.

conclusionsThe motion management system on the Elekta Unity provides advanced capabilities for treating moving targets. The results of this work support the ability of the system to deliver accurate radiotherapy plans with reasonable uncertainties. However, as demonstrated by exhale gating results, better understanding of the clinical impacts of these new functionalities may be warranted.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingParticle AcceleratorsHumansMovementNeoplasmsPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRespirationComprehensive motion management (CMM)Elekta UnityEnd-to-end testingGating latencyMR-Linac (MRL)Real-time tumor trackingRespiratory motion managementTracking accuracy

Identifiers

PMID41092642
PMCPMC12673532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.