ArticlePhysica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)2025
Characterizing the motion management system accuracy on a 1.5T MR-Linac.
Article in Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- S2V-DREME: a time-resolved slice-to-volume MR image reconstruction framework with dynamic reconstruction and motion estimation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMotion management techniques have enabled drastic reductions in treatment volume allowing for dose escalation. The superior contrast of MRI combined with the ability to perform cine imaging during treatment enable surrogate-less tracking for gating. The purpose of this work is to commission motion management system with gating capabilities on the 1.5T MR-Linac and to characterize system performance.
methodsLinear accelerator stability during gating was measured for a wide range of duty cycles (16 % - 100 %). Motion tracking accuracy and gating latency were characterized for varying target sizes and breathing rates, and with and without adaptive motion prediction using a commercially available motion phantom. Clinical treatment plans were created for lung, prostate, pancreas, and liver sites, using varied gating strategies and tumor motion amplitudes. Film measurements were performed for each plan and compared to either the treatment planning system (TPS) or a reference film delivery. Finally, end-to-end testing was performed with the motion phantom and film to quantify the delivery accuracy of the system for exception and free-breathing gating strategies.
resultsBeam characteristics were stable for all duty cycles analyzed, with all measurements within 0.6 % of the ungated baseline. Tracking accuracy showed a strong dependence on breathing rate. The system had difficulties tracking a 1 cm target due to through plane motion caused by the helical path of the phantom. Film comparisons for the clinical plans demonstrated average dose differences within 1.8 % and gamma passing rates (3 %/2 mm) >75 % within the 50 % isodose line. The cases with the worst gamma passing rates corresponded to exhale gating strategy where a systematic shift in dose was observed due to tumor motion interplay with the gating envelope. End-to-end testing showed excellent dose agreement (<3 % average dose difference) and a localization accuracy of <1 mm for targets with non-periodic motion and <2 mm for moving targets.
conclusionsThe motion management system on the Elekta Unity provides advanced capabilities for treating moving targets. The results of this work support the ability of the system to deliver accurate radiotherapy plans with reasonable uncertainties. However, as demonstrated by exhale gating results, better understanding of the clinical impacts of these new functionalities may be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.