SynthesisPatient education and counseling2026
Patient-clinician communication in longitudinal care settings about adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and adult traumas: A systematic review of reviews.
Synthesis in Patient education and counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zero Tolerance for Patient-Perpetrated Sexual Harassment.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Internal Medicine Residents' Challenges in Trauma-Informed Care and Impact on Patient Care: A Multiple-Methods Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSynthesize the literature on strategies for clinician communication or relationship-building during longitudinal care visits with adult patients who have had adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and/or other traumas later in life.
methodsSystematic searches of literature reviews from 2012 to 2022 using CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science and Sociological Abstracts. Search terms reflected three key concepts: 1) Trauma (i.e., trauma, interpersonal violence, adverse childhood experiences), 2) Patient-provider communication/relationship-building (i.e., communication), and 3) Longitudinal patient care (primary care). Three researchers independently reviewed each title, abstract, and article to determine relevance and completed methodological quality appraisal using the AMSTAR-2 framework. Thematic analysis was used to identify key learning points and gaps in the literature.
resultsWe screened 1158 articles and included 39 manuscripts: 15 % (n = 6) of the manuscripts discussed ACEs, 49 % (n = 19) discussed adult traumas, and 36 % (n = 14) discussed trauma-informed care (TIC) approaches with both or no age determination of exposure to trauma. Themes related to the role of screening, strategies to optimize communication, the importance of resources and institutional support, and associated health outcomes. According to the AMSTAR-2, most of the studies had low or critically low methodological quality.
conclusionCommunication with clinicians about traumatic experiences shows potential benefit to adult primary care patients. Future research rigorously evaluating training on and implementation of best practices in trauma communication is needed. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinician- and systems-level readiness to respond to and engage in conversations about traumatic experiences with adult primary care patients requires organizational support, including sustained intervention efforts, trauma communication training, and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.