ArticleBlood advances2026
Diagnostic sequencing identifies high-risk markers and mechanisms of resistance to guide immunotherapy selection.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractHere, we present the case for next-generation sequencing of samples from patients with multiple myeloma (MM), not only identify high-risk markers but also mutations and deletions relating to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), and more importantly to guide the sequencing of immunotherapy regimens in response to intrinsic antigen escape as a means of treatment resistance and relapse. This is a single-center study of CD138+ selected (n = 134) bone marrow aspirate samples from patients with smoldering MM (n = 11) and MM (newly diagnosed, n = 38; relapsed, n = 79). Samples were sequenced using a targeted panel in a clinical diagnostics laboratory. Data were analyzed for high-risk markers, treatment-related resistance mechanisms, and precision medicine targets to guide the future treatment of patients in the clinic. High-risk markers, including t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain or amplification 1q, deletion of CDKN2C, and deletion or mutation of TP53, were identified in 15% samples from patients with newly diagnosed. At relapse, alterations in the cereblon degradation pathway were found in 24.3% of IMiD-treated patients. Deletions of 4p (CD38) were also enriched in patients who received anti-CD38 treatment (P = .03), which were mostly monoallelic. Deletions and mutations were detected in TNFRSF17-encoding B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) in patients treated with anti-BCMA regimens, and the information was used to change the treatment of the patients. Targeted sequencing of diagnostic samples of patients with MM can be used for risk stratification and to monitor and adjust treatments as resistance mechanisms evolve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.