Observational studyThe New England journal of medicine2025
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Gene Therapy for Adenosine Deaminase Deficiency.
Observational study in The New England journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04049084 (An Observational Long-term Follow-up Study for Patients Previously Treated With Autologous ex Vivo Gene Therapy for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Due to Adenosine Deaminase Deficiency), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Observational Long-term Follow-up Study for Patients Previously Treated With Autologous ex Vivo Gene Therapy for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Due to Adenosine Deaminase Deficiency (ADA-SCID)
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nucleotide Metabolism in Health and Disease.MedComm · 2026Review
- CD117 epitope-shielded hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with toxin-free conditioning and in vivo selection ameliorates a β-thalassemia model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Updated EBMT/ESID inborn errors working party guidelines for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for inborn errors of immunity and metabolism.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review of IL-10 and IL-10 Receptor Deficiencies: From Basic Science to Clinical Bedside.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Gene modification: Exploring the potential in treating kidney diseases.Pharmacological research · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSevere combined immunodeficiency (SCID) due to adenosine deaminase (ADA) deficiency (ADA-SCID) is a life-threatening inborn error of immunity for which lentiviral gene therapy has been investigated in clinical trials.
methodsBetween 2012 and 2019, we treated patients who had ADA-SCID with busulfan nonmyeloablative conditioning followed by transplantation with autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells transduced ex vivo with a lentiviral vector encoding human
resultsWe treated 62 patients with ADA-SCID in the United States (33 patients) and the United Kingdom (29 patients). Overall survival was 100%, and event-free survival was 95% (59 of 62 patients). All 59 patients who had successful gene-marked engraftment at 6 months have continued not to receive enzyme-replacement therapy and have had stable gene marking, ADA enzyme activity, metabolic detoxification, and immune reconstitution through the last follow-up; 58 of these patients (98%) discontinued IgG replacement therapy and have evidence of a robust response to vaccinations. None of the patients had a leukoproliferative event or clonal expansion.
conclusionsThese long-term findings in a large patient cohort show the sustained clinical efficacy and safety of autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem-cell lentiviral gene therapy for ADA-SCID, indicating that it is a curative treatment. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04049084.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.