Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2026
Secukinumab in active lupus nephritis: results from a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled study (SELUNE) and an open-label extension study.
Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Two-year, Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of 300 mg s.c. Secukinumab Versus Placebo, in Combination With SoC Therapy, in Patients With Active Lupus Nephritis
A Three-year, Open-label Extension Study of Subcutaneous Secukinumab to Evaluate the Long-term Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability in Patients With Active Lupus Nephritis
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systemic Treatment Strategies for Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in the Setting of ANA Positivity or Lupus Spectrum Disease: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- The role of interleukin-17 inhibition in systemic lupus erythematosus-paradoxical hindrance or new therapeutic potential? Results from a systematic literature review and mendelian randomization.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Secukinumab in Hidradenitis Suppurativa With Concomitant Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Advanced Kidney Disease: A Case Series Exploring the Il-17 Skin-Kidney Axis.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- Immunological cross-talk between periodontitis and systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of T-B cell dysregulation in the shared pathogenic network.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of s.c. secukinumab 300 mg combined with standard of care (SoC) in adult patients with active LN.
methodsThe core study was a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study (planned duration: 104 weeks) of patients with active LN. Eligible patients were randomized to receive secukinumab 300 mg or placebo for the first 4 weeks, followed by a monthly maintenance dose, with all patients receiving a SoC background regimen. Patients completing the 104-week treatment of the core study were eligible for an open-label extension study (planned duration: up to 260 weeks) to receive secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks. The primary end point of the core study was the proportion of patients achieving complete renal response (CRR) at week 52.
resultsBoth studies were terminated early, following a planned futility analysis in the core study that showed no clinically meaningful benefit of secukinumab over placebo. In the core study, the proportion of patients achieving CRR at week 52 was lower after receiving secukinumab (24.2%) than after receiving the placebo (36.3%). No differences were observed between the secukinumab and placebo groups in any of the secondary end points of the core study. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between the secukinumab and placebo groups. In the extension study, the results were not interpretable, owing to the low patient number included in the data analysis (n = 31).
conclusionSecukinumab did not demonstrate superior efficacy over placebo in patients with active LN. Secukinumab was well-tolerated with no new or unexpected safety signals detected.
trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04181762, NCT04181762 (Novartis study code: CAIN457Q12301). https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05232864, NCT05232864 (Novartis study code: CAIN457Q12301E1).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.