ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2025
Transmission risk of Trypanosoma cruzi through blood donors in a third-level care hospital.
Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood transfusion is a major way of Trypanosoma cruzi transmission, a neglected parasite infection that produces Chagas disease (CD). CD has high morbidity and is potentially fatal in the chronic phase due to the parasite's ability to invade the myocardium, colon, and esophagus. CD prevalence focuses on Latin America; however, its presence in non-endemic areas has been increasing in the last decade, particularly in North America and Europe, due to high migration rates of infected people. This study established the CD seroprevalence in a blood bank located in Mexico City. A total of 851 donor samples were analyzed by ELISAn and Western blotn (ELISA and WB using native antigens obtained from Mexican strains). Positive samples were analyzed by a commercial ELISA kit, named Chagatest (non-native antigens). Average donor age was 36.5 years, and most were men. Seroprevalence by ELISAn and WBn was 3.9% (33/851); whereas by Chagatest only six samples (0.7%) were reactive. Mexico City is not considered an endemic CD area; however, the high mobility of infected people increases the transmission risk in all receptor areas, particularly in blood banks, as seen in this study. Our findings showed a difference between native and non-native serological tests, and the need to maximize the identification of infected people to curb CD spread.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.