Trial reportBrazilian oral research2025
Additional root canal enlargement increases immediate postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effect of an additional instrument following the single-file instrumentation approach on postoperative pain. Fifty-six mandibular molars with asymptomatic apical periodontitis were randomly assigned to two groups: G1 - instrumentation using a single reciprocating file; G2 - additional enlargement. The frequency and intensity of postoperative pain were assessed at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days after endodontic treatment using the numerical pain assessment scale (NPAS) (Mann-Whitney U test). Analgesic intake was also recorded and analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. The incidence of root canal filling extrusion was also evaluated (chi-square). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. At 24 h, the incidence of postoperative pain was higher when additional enlargement was performed (p = 0.019). The incidence of pain was similar between groups after 48 h (p = 0.121) and 7 days (p = 1.000). The intensity of pain was also higher at 24 h in Group 2 (p = 0.019), while it was similar between groups after 48 h (p = 0.177) and 7 days (p = 1.000). The frequency of analgesic intake was higher in Group 2 after 24 h (p = 0.019). The incidence of root canal filling material extrusion was similar in both groups (p = 0.181). In conclusion, additional enlargement following single-file root canal preparation resulted in a higher incidence and intensity of postoperative pain immediately after treatment (24 h), with no significant impact at 48 h and 7 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.